- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 5 months ago by Odile Dayez.
I’ve always chosen to devote my voluntary energy and my professional time to projects working with people made vulnerable by life and society: orphaned children, homeless people, refugees, people with disabilities.
We often talk about exemplarity as a leader, but for me it’s also central to the structure.
And the point that obsesses me and has often made me angry in the debates of the executive committee of which I was a member, is the coherence between the cause we are defending and the way we organise our work and treat our team.
What about a social project that pays so poorly that it creates working poor, or a structure so hierarchical that it doesn’t allow the autonomy it defends? Or a social integration enterprise that excludes the expression of religious differences at work?
I particularly fought against all the privileges given to management (of which I was one), as this seemed to me to go against the battle against inequality and for greater social justice.
I once tore off the “direction” labels that reserved the best parking spaces.
In general, it wasn’t always easy to deal with… Clearly… And I was often pointed out as the one giving the lessons…
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.